Wolf Hall - Hilary Mantel

I stopped posting book and album reviews generally on this blog as largely I felt they were rubbish - I'm no critic and I noticed a lot of reader traffic was to these posts, I personally felt I was doing the authors often a disservice in my reviews as I say... I'm no critic.  If I was all about driving traffic to the blog I'd only do reviews - many of them get 1000s of reads!  Often with the music stuff I'm going to wax lyrical as I'm already a fan I'm normally reviewing something I was obviously going to buy so people aren't reading an unbias review but often a fan's eulogy.

Anyway I have to mention this book.  I bought this as a result of seeing Ms Mantel receiving much critical acclaim and prizes for it and it's sequel which I daftly bought at the same time and will now I fear remain forever unopened.

Sadly though I've given up reading it less than half way through.  I just can't get into it at all - the writing style is virtually all dialogue or brief snippets underneath about the underlying politics etc. under the dialogue.  But I get so lost,  and there is no visualisation of the places etc. I feel the thing is a complete void as though I'm only listening to the dialogue in a film where at least 50% of the information about the story is lost to me.  It may present Thomas Cromwell in a completely new light but frankly I just lose the plot with almost every page turn.

So the lesson - I shouldn't believe all the awards stuff.  Probably I should avoid a book that has one an esteemed literary prize on this basis as I clearly don't get it and can't read a novel like this with the required level of intellect.

On the Wikipedia page about Wolf Hall I found this quote from a professional reviewer...

"...dreadfully badly written... Mantel just wrote and wrote and wrote. I have yet to meet anyone outside the Booker panel who managed to get to the end of this tedious tome. God forbid there might be a sequel, which I fear is on the horizon. — Susan Bassnett, in Times Higher Education[8]"

So - not just me then...  Having read that I do have a little bit of "Emperors Clothes" thinking about it. If the Booker panel did fail to read it as Susan Bassnett alleges how did it win the prize?

Comments

  1. SoberMomWrites7 March 2013 at 17:29

    Good question. Thanks for letting me know. I hate it when I buy a book because of a review by some hoity toity group only to put it down because it's awful, or poorly written, or just plain boring. It makes me angry that I've wasted the money and it makes me feel like I'm missing something!

    So nice you found the other review. That would make me feel much better. ;-)

    Sherry

    ReplyDelete
  2. C7 March 2013 at 18:37

    I do sometimes wonder what criteria are used to judge books for prizes. Who really read something that's so challenging it becomes hard work to keep up or understand? I do sometimes wonder, like you, if there is an Emperor's New Clothes approach to things, and we're fooled into thinking we're "supposed" to like something because it's deemed as clever or original or whatever. But surely a good book is one that can transport effortlessly into its world, is written well enough to make me feel it, see it and live it, and then think about it afterwards. Never 'a tedious tome'!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ian B26 March 2013 at 15:42

    reached here via DIY guitars on Facebook and was looking around. Nice blog :-) Just wanted to say I loved both Wolf Hall and Bring Up The Bodies. And I'm not, heaven forbid, a Booker Prize judge!

    Ian
    Edinburgh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Furtheron26 March 2013 at 17:43

      Welcome Mr P. Well there is proof of the old adage "beauty is in the eye of the beholder "!

      Delete
  4. Roslyn Ross5 August 2014 at 10:07

    Truly badly written and not worth even attempting to read is my assessment of Wolf Hall and I suspect she won the prize because the readers decided it was so difficult it had to be clever and perhaps she really was a James Joyce etc. etc.

    God it was just so awful it makes the book judges look like fools.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fantasy Signature Guitar

Image
I got this from IHeartGuitarBlog who got it from the Seymour Duncan User Group Forum Here are a set of questions to answer about your own fantasy signature guitar... Q1: Which company called you? Q2: Which standard model in their product lineup do you base your sig off of? Q3: What specs do you insist upon that make it uniquely yours? Q4: What other customizations do you make to the guitar? Q5: What special piece of “case candy” goes with it as a collector’s item? Right here goes... Q1: Which company called you? Fender Q2: Which standard model in their product lineup do you base your sig off of? Strat. Q3: What specs do you insist upon that make it uniquely yours? Ash body, rosewood fingerboard 12" radius, large 70s style headstock but four bolt neck joint. Non trem! Twin humbuckers, with tone and vol each and coil taps on the tone controls. Q4: What other customizations do you make to the guitar? Locking machine heads - not really needed but make string chan
Read more

12 String Guitar - Bridge Doctor Installation

Image
Remember my 12 string needing to have it's overbelly reduced?  Well I ordered a Bridge Doctor  from StewMac in the USA which arrived in a couple of weeks. Here is the bridge doctor before installation Here is the action before - about 5mm on the bass side and about 3mm on the treble. The guitar on the workbench Hole drilled - I got a 1/4" brad bit for the outer hole and used a cocktail stick marked at 1/8" as my depth gauge.  You get a little plastic dot you can inlay over the screw once finished - I may do that later when I get happy with it.  Luckily I have a local little hardware shop that stock imperial drills and are cheaper than the big stores... no doubt as the stock has been there 20 years! Set the doctor to the best width - the circular plastic bolt holder has three settings - I used the widest you can see to allow string clearance on the 12 string - on a 6 string the middle would probably be best setting.  The doctor installed - t
Read more

Let's talk plectrums...

... or should that be plectra I'm no good at that kind of English... to boldly go and all that. (If you are not a guitarist here is a health warning about this post, it may lead to you attempting to chew off a limb to retain conscious or keep your sanity...) My history of plectrum use is... Bloody huge triangular Gibson ones, heavy, I used to wear them out so they ended up pretty much circular in a matter of days/weeks. Odd at that time I had a Strat copy and used Gibson Strings and Gibson picks - I even went for Gibson strings with a wound third at one point after reading heavier strings gave a better tone... yes but you can't play the damn thing and could never get the intonation sorted out after an older mentor showed me what that nonsense was all about. For a long time there after I used Fender medium the hard once, often in tortoiseshell as I thought that classy for some bizarre reason. "Hello darling look at my tortoiseshell picks." I never had many girlfriends
Read more